Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux). Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.7x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.35
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.70
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

41.7B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 41.7B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 134.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.8 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

10 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.35/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 49.0%)
Higher IFEval score (85.8% vs 84.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.8% vs 71.1%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (88.4% vs 86.8%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 72B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

Is Qwen2.5 72B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct costs $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.35 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.