Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct ($0.70/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$0.70
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.4B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 23.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct, making it 307.4% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
7.6Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
7.6B
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 32,768 tokens, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Tue Apr 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 7B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.70/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.29/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.99/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 36.4%)
Higher IFEval score (85.8% vs 71.2%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.8% vs 56.3%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (88.4% vs 75.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 7B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.6%, MT-Bench: 87.5%, HumanEval: 84.8%, MBPP: 79.2%, MATH: 75.5%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs $0.30/M input and $0.30/M output via together. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.20/M input and $0.70/M output via novita.
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.20/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.