Model Comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs QwQ-32B

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

500.0M diff

QwQ-32B has 0.5B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 1.6% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
32.5Bparameters
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.5B
QwQ-32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat May 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 6 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.2 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct's cutoff date.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher LiveCodeBench score (63.4% vs 31.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct or QwQ-32B?

QwQ-32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct and QwQ-32B?

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.