Model Comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

Qwen2 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

11 benchmarks

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP), while Qwen2 72B Instruct is better at 9 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, HellaSwag, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, TheoremQA, TruthfulQA, Winogrande).

Qwen2 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

65.0B diff

Qwen2 72B Instruct has 65.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 928.6% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
72.0B
Qwen2 72B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen2 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen2 72B Instruct was released on 2024-07-23.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is 2 months newer than Qwen2 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct

Jul 23, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher HumanEval score (88.4% vs 86.0%)
Higher MBPP score (83.5% vs 80.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher ARC-C score (68.9% vs 60.9%)
Higher GSM8k score (91.1% vs 83.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (87.6% vs 76.8%)
Higher MATH score (59.7% vs 46.6%)
Higher MMLU score (82.3% vs 67.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (64.4% vs 40.1%)
Higher TheoremQA score (44.4% vs 34.0%)
Higher TruthfulQA score (54.8% vs 50.6%)
Higher Winogrande score (85.1% vs 72.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct vs Qwen2 72B Instruct

Qwen2 72B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%. Qwen2 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.1%, CMMLU: 90.1%, HellaSwag: 87.6%, HumanEval: 86.0%, Winogrande: 85.1%.
Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.