The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.7 to 9.9.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.5-9B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.7 to 9.9, ranking #153 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.5-9B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.5-9B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.7 and ranks #153 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
9.9
#258
24.7
#153
8.6
#260
24.6
#147
-2.8
#167
9.0
#122
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Qwen3.5-9B
11.8#231
24.1#115
6.8#153
24.2#60
6.8#137
24.2#50
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct · 25 for Qwen3.5-9B

2 shared

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-9B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen3.5-9B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

24.5B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 24.5B more parameters than Qwen3.5-9B, making it 272.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-9B
9.0Bparameters
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
9.0B
Qwen3.5-9B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.5-9B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28, while Qwen3.5-9B was released on 2026-03-02.

Qwen3.5-9B is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

Qwen3.5-9B

Mar 2, 2026

6 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.7 to 9.9. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.5-9B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct compare to Qwen3.5-9B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%. Qwen3.5-9B scores IFEval: 91.5%, MMLU-Redux: 91.1%, C-Eval: 88.2%, MAXIFE: 83.4%, Global PIQA: 83.2%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (9.9 vs 24.7). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.