The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision). Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
Released
Jan 2025
Aug 2026
License
tongyi-qianwen
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-27B is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision).

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

44.2B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct has 44.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 159.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is licensed under tongyi-qianwen, while Qwen3.8-27B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 19 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3.8-27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-27B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include licensing (tongyi-qianwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.