Model Comparison

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs GPT OSS 120B

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. GPT OSS 120B is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT OSS 120B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GPT OSS 120B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.15/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 ($0.80/1M tokens) is 1.8x more expensive than GPT OSS 120B ($0.45/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is more expensive than GPT OSS 120B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$0.80

Best providerFireworks

GPT OSS 120B

Input tokens$0.09

Output tokens$0.45

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

118.2B diff

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 has 118.2B more parameters than GPT OSS 120B, making it 101.2% larger.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

235.0Bparameters

GPT OSS 120B

116.8Bparameters

235.0B

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

116.8B

GPT OSS 120B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GPT OSS 120B's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Input262,144 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

GPT OSS 120B

Input131,072 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Mon May 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Apache 2.0

Open weights

GPT OSS 120B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 was released on 2025-07-22, while GPT OSS 120B was released on 2025-08-05.

GPT OSS 120B is 0 month newer than Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Jul 22, 2025

9 months ago

GPT OSS 120B

Aug 5, 2025

9 months ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is available from Fireworks, Novita. GPT OSS 120B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, OpenAI, Fireworks, Groq.

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

GPT OSS 120B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.45/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

OpenAI

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Groq

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

GPT OSS 120B

View details

OpenAI

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Higher GPQA score (80.1% vs 77.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507	GPT OSS 120B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 vs GPT OSS 120B.

Which is better, Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 or GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and GPT OSS 120B is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 compare to GPT OSS 120B in benchmarks?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 scores ZebraLogic: 95.0%, MMLU-Redux: 93.1%, IFEval: 88.7%, MultiPL-E: 87.9%, Creative Writing v3: 87.5%. GPT OSS 120B scores MMLU: 90.0%, CodeForces: 82.1%, GPQA: 80.1%, TAU-bench Retail: 67.8%, HealthBench: 57.6%.

Is Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 cheaper than GPT OSS 120B?

GPT OSS 120B is 1.7x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 costs $0.15/M input and $0.80/M output via fireworks. GPT OSS 120B costs $0.09/M input and $0.45/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and GPT OSS 120B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 supports 262K tokens and GPT OSS 120B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and GPT OSS 120B?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.15 vs $0.09/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 and GPT OSS 120B?

Qwen3-235B-A22B-Instruct-2507 is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and GPT OSS 120B is developed by OpenAI.