Model Comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 32BWhich is better in 2026?
Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is 1.5x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 32B — which is better?
Qwen3 235B A22B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 32B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Qwen3 235B A22B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (Aider, AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Arena Hard, BFCL, LiveBench, LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (MultiLF). Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3 235B A22B is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Choose Qwen3 235B A22B if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 8 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
Choose Qwen3 32B if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3 235B A22B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (Aider, AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Arena Hard, BFCL, LiveBench, LiveCodeBench), while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (MultiLF).
Qwen3 235B A22B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 3.0x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 32B is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 235B A22B has 202.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 616.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2025-04-29.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Apr 29, 2025
1.2 years ago
Apr 29, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.
Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 32B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 235B A22B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3 32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 32B.