Model Comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is 4.9x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Qwen3 235B A22B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Include, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SuperGPQA).

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed May 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3 235B A22B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 15.0x cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is more expensive than Qwen3 235B A22B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed May 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Qwen3 235B A22B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.10

Best providerFireworks

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Input tokens$0.15

Output tokens$1.50

Best providerNovita

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

155.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 155.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 193.8% larger.

Qwen3 235B A22B

235.0Bparameters

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

80.0Bparameters

235.0B

Qwen3 235B A22B

80.0B

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 235B A22B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Input65,536 tokens

Output65,536 tokens

Wed May 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 4 months newer than Qwen3 235B A22B.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

1.1 years ago

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

8 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3 235B A22B is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita, Together. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.50/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AIME 2025 score (87.8% vs 81.5%)

Higher GPQA score (77.2% vs 47.5%)

Higher Include score (78.9% vs 73.5%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.7% vs 68.2%)

Higher MMLU-Redux score (92.5% vs 87.4%)

Higher SuperGPQA score (60.8% vs 44.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Qwen3 235B A22B	Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3 235B A22B compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

Is Qwen3 235B A22B cheaper than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3 235B A22B is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3 235B A22B costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via fireworks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking costs $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 66K), input pricing ($0.10 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.