Qwen3 32B vs Step-3.5-Flash Comparison

Comparing Qwen3 32B and Step-3.5-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen3 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Step-3.5-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (AIME 2025).

Step-3.5-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3 32B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens) costs the same as Step-3.5-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Step-3.5-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Step-3.5-Flash is more expensive than Qwen3 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
StepFun
Step-3.5-Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerStepFun
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

163.2B diff

Step-3.5-Flash has 163.2B more parameters than Qwen3 32B, making it 497.6% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
StepFun
Step-3.5-Flash
196.0Bparameters
32.8B
Qwen3 32B
196.0B
Step-3.5-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3 32B accepts 128,000 input tokens compared to Step-3.5-Flash's 65,536 tokens. Qwen3 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Step-3.5-Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
StepFun
Step-3.5-Flash
Input65,536 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat Mar 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Step-3.5-Flash

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29, while Step-3.5-Flash was released on 2026-02-02.

Step-3.5-Flash is 9 months newer than Qwen3 32B.

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

10 months ago

Step-3.5-Flash

Feb 2, 2026

1 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova. Step-3.5-Flash is available from StepFun. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M

Step-3.5-Flash

stepfun logo
StepFun
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2025 score (97.3% vs 72.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
StepFun
Step-3.5-Flash