The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B

Comparing Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8-27B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—
Released
Jan 2025
Aug 2026
License
Apache 2.0
Apache 2.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

452.2B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 452.2B more parameters than Qwen3.8-27B, making it 1627.8% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-27B
27.8Bparameters
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
27.8B
Qwen3.8-27B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.8-27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8-27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-27B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3.8-27B was released on 2026-08-14.

Qwen3.8-27B is 19 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.6 years ago

Qwen3.8-27B

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.5yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3.8-27B.

Which is better, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct or Qwen3.8-27B?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3.8-27B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8-27B in benchmarks?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%. Qwen3.8-27B scores MathVision: 94.6%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 90.3%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, GPQA: 89.2%.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3.8-27B?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons