Model Comparison
Qwen3 Max vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is 3.3x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Qwen3 Max vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking — which is better?
Qwen3 Max (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Qwen3 Max outperforms in 2 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench v6, SuperGPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
On price, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 Max also accepts a larger context window (256,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Qwen3 Max if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 256,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025
Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking if…
- cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3 Max outperforms in 2 benchmarks (LiveCodeBench v6, SuperGPQA), while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3 Max ($0.50/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3 Max ($5.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking ($1.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 Max is more expensive than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 Max has 920.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 1150.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 Max accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking's 65,536 tokens. Qwen3 Max can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is limited to 65,536 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Qwen3 Max is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3 Max was released on 2025-12-15, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.
Qwen3 Max is 3 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.
Dec 15, 2025
6 months ago
3mo newerSep 10, 2025
9 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3 Max is available from Novita. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is available from Novita.
Qwen3 Max
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 Max
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3 Max vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.