Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 7.4x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Claude Opus 4.7 is better at 6 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMMLU, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0).

Claude Opus 4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 8.3x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 ($5.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 6.9x cheaper than Claude Opus 4.7 ($25.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Opus 4.7 is more expensive than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input tokens$5.00
Output tokens$25.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 4.7 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's 262,144 tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Claude Opus 4.7 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude Opus 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Claude Opus 4.7 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Claude Opus 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Claude Opus 4.7 was released on 2026-04-16.

Claude Opus 4.7 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

1 months ago

Claude Opus 4.7

Apr 16, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. Claude Opus 4.7 is available from Anthropic.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

Claude Opus 4.7

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $5.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $25.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Anthropic
Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher BrowseComp score (79.3% vs 69.0%)
Higher GPQA score (94.2% vs 88.4%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (54.7% vs 28.7%)
Higher MMMLU score (91.5% vs 88.5%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (87.6% vs 76.4%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (69.4% vs 52.5%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Claude Opus 4.7

Claude Opus 4.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Claude Opus 4.7 is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Claude Opus 4.7 scores GPQA: 94.2%, MMMLU: 91.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 87.6%, BrowseComp: 79.3%.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 8.3x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. Claude Opus 4.7 costs $5.00/M input and $25.00/M output via anthropic.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and Claude Opus 4.7 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (262K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.60 vs $5.00/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Claude Opus 4.7 is developed by Anthropic.