Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2026, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MMLU-Pro, MMMLU, t2-bench), while Gemma 4 31B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

366.3B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 366.3B more parameters than Gemma 4 31B, making it 1193.2% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 4 31B
30.7Bparameters
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
30.7B
Gemma 4 31B

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Gemma 4 31B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02.

Gemma 4 31B is 2 months newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

1 months ago

Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

0 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher AIME 2026 score (91.3% vs 89.2%)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 84.3%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (28.7% vs 26.5%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (83.6% vs 80.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.8% vs 85.2%)
Higher MMMLU score (88.5% vs 88.4%)
Higher t2-bench score (86.7% vs 86.4%)
Google

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Google
Gemma 4 31B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Gemma 4 31B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google.