Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs GLM-4.7-Flash Comparison

Comparing Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-4.7-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 4 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while GLM-4.7-Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 8.6x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.07/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 9.0x more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is more expensive than GLM-4.7-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Input tokens$0.60

Output tokens$3.60

Best providerNovita

GLM-4.7-Flash

Input tokens$0.07

Output tokens$0.40

Best providerUnknown Organization

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

367.0B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 367.0B more parameters than GLM-4.7-Flash, making it 1223.3% larger.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

397.0Bparameters

GLM-4.7-Flash

30.0Bparameters

397.0B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

30.0B

GLM-4.7-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GLM-4.7-Flash's 128,000 tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while GLM-4.7-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Input262,144 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

GLM-4.7-Flash

Input128,000 tokens

Output16,384 tokens

Tue Mar 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-4.7-Flash does not.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

GLM-4.7-Flash

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while GLM-4.7-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

GLM-4.7-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while GLM-4.7-Flash was released on 2026-01-19.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 1 month newer than GLM-4.7-Flash.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

4 weeks ago

4w newer

GLM-4.7-Flash

Jan 19, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. GLM-4.7-Flash is available from ZAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.