Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs GLM-5V-Turbo

Comparing Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($1.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo ($4.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5V-Turbo is more expensive than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Wed May 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Input tokens$0.60

Output tokens$3.60

Best providerNovita

GLM-5V-Turbo

Input tokens$1.20

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerUnknown Organization

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to GLM-5V-Turbo's 200,000 tokens. GLM-5V-Turbo can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Input262,144 tokens

Output64,000 tokens

GLM-5V-Turbo

Input200,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Wed May 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text

Images

Audio

Video

GLM-5V-Turbo

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while GLM-5V-Turbo uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

GLM-5V-Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while GLM-5V-Turbo was released on 2026-04-02.

GLM-5V-Turbo is 2 months newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

3 months ago

GLM-5V-Turbo

Apr 2, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. GLM-5V-Turbo is available from ZAI.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

GLM-5V-Turbo

Unknown Organization

Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (262,144 tokens)

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

GLM-5V-Turbo

View details

Zhipu AI

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Qwen3.5-397B-A17B	GLM-5V-Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs GLM-5V-Turbo.

Which is better, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or GLM-5V-Turbo?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and GLM-5V-Turbo (Zhipu AI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Qwen3.5-397B-A17B compare to GLM-5V-Turbo in benchmarks?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. GLM-5V-Turbo scores Design2Code: 94.8%, Flame-VLM-Code: 93.8%, V*: 89.0%, WebVoyager: 88.5%, PinchBench: 80.7%.

Is Qwen3.5-397B-A17B cheaper than GLM-5V-Turbo?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 2.0x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. GLM-5V-Turbo costs $1.20/M input and $4.00/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and GLM-5V-Turbo supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Key differences include context window (262K vs 200K), input pricing ($0.60 vs $1.20/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and GLM-5V-Turbo?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and GLM-5V-Turbo is developed by Zhipu AI.