Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Grok Imagine Image Pro Comparison
Comparing Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Grok Imagine Image Pro across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Grok Imagine Image Pro don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Grok Imagine Image Pro's 131,072 tokens. Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Grok Imagine Image Pro does not.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Grok Imagine Image Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Grok Imagine Image Pro uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Grok Imagine Image Pro was released on 2026-02-01.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 1 month newer than Grok Imagine Image Pro.
Feb 16, 2026
4 weeks ago
2w newerFeb 1, 2026
1 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. Grok Imagine Image Pro is available from xAI. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Grok Imagine Image Pro
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|