Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs MiMo-V2-Flash Comparison
Comparing Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and MiMo-V2-Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 9 benchmarks (BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, LongBench v2, MMLU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while MiMo-V2-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (SWE-bench Multilingual).
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is more expensive than MiMo-V2-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 88.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2-Flash, making it 28.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can generate longer responses up to 64,000 tokens, while MiMo-V2-Flash is limited to 16,384 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2-Flash does not.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
MiMo-V2-Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2-Flash uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while MiMo-V2-Flash was released on 2025-12-16.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 2 months newer than MiMo-V2-Flash.
Feb 16, 2026
4 weeks ago
2mo newerDec 16, 2025
3 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. MiMo-V2-Flash is available from Xiaomi. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
MiMo-V2-Flash
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|