Model Comparison
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax M2.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiniMax M2.7 is better at 3 benchmarks (SWE-bench Multilingual, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon).
MiniMax M2.7 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.7 does not.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
MiniMax M2.7
License
Usage and distribution terms
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiniMax M2.7 uses MIT.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
MIT
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while MiniMax M2.7 was released on 2026-03-18.
MiniMax M2.7 is 1 month newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.
Feb 16, 2026
1 months ago
Mar 18, 2026
2 weeks ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
MiniMax M2.7
View detailsMiniMax
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs MiniMax M2.7