Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Step3-VL-10B Comparison
Comparing Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Step3-VL-10B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Multi-Challenge), while Step3-VL-10B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 387.0B more parameters than Step3-VL-10B, making it 3870.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Step3-VL-10B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Step3-VL-10B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Step3-VL-10B was released on 2026-01-15.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 1 month newer than Step3-VL-10B.
Feb 16, 2026
4 weeks ago
1mo newerJan 15, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Step3-VL-10B
View detailsStepFun
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|