Model Comparison

Qwen3.7-Plus vs Gemma 4 31BWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 4 31B is 2.9x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.7-Plus vs Gemma 4 31B — which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Gemma 4 31B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 8 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MMLU-Pro, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro), while Gemma 4 31B is better at 0 benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Gemma 4 31B is roughly 2.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7-Plus also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Choose Gemma 4 31B if…

  • cost matters — it's about 2.9x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 8 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, LiveCodeBench v6, MathVision, MMLU-Pro, MMMLU, MMMU-Pro), while Gemma 4 31B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 4 31B costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemma 4 31B ($0.13/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens) is 3.4x more expensive than Gemma 4 31B ($0.38/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7-Plus is more expensive than Gemma 4 31B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input tokens$0.13
Output tokens$0.38
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7-Plus accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 4 31B's 262,144 tokens. Gemma 4 31B can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input262,144 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.7-Plus and Gemma 4 31B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.7-Plus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 4 31B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31, while Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02.

Qwen3.7-Plus is 2 months newer than Gemma 4 31B.

Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer
Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 31B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 31B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.7-Plus's cutoff date.

Qwen3.7-Plus

—

Gemma 4 31B

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together. Gemma 4 31B is available from DeepInfra, FriendliAI, Novita, Together.

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M

Gemma 4 31B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.13/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.38/1M
friendli logo
FriendliAI
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.39/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.97/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7-Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Higher GDPval-AA score (31.5% vs 26.1%)
Higher GPQA score (90.3% vs 84.3%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (34.7% vs 26.5%)
Higher LiveCodeBench v6 score (89.6% vs 80.0%)
Higher MathVision score (90.3% vs 85.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (88.5% vs 85.2%)
Higher MMMLU score (89.0% vs 88.4%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (79.0% vs 76.9%)
Google
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7-Plus and Gemma 4 31B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7-Plus
✓ Preferred
Gemma 4 31B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Google
Gemma 4 31B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7-Plus vs Gemma 4 31B.

Which is better, Qwen3.7-Plus or Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemma 4 31B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.7-Plus compare to Gemma 4 31B in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%. Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%.

Is Qwen3.7-Plus cheaper than Gemma 4 31B?

Gemma 4 31B is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together. Gemma 4 31B costs $0.13/M input and $0.38/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7-Plus and Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7-Plus and Gemma 4 31B?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.32 vs $0.13/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.7-Plus and Gemma 4 31B?

Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons