Model Comparison

Qwen3.7-Plus vs Muse Spark 1.1Which is better in 2026?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3.7-Plus vs Muse Spark 1.1 — which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Muse Spark 1.1 (by Meta) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 7 benchmarks (BabyVision, CharXiv-R, Finance Agent v2, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro). Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output

Choose Muse Spark 1.1 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 7 benchmarks (BabyVision, CharXiv-R, Finance Agent v2, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, OSWorld-Verified, SWE-Bench Pro).

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.7-Plus specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.7-Plus and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

Muse Spark 1.1 is 1 month newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

1 months ago

Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.7-Plus

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (1,000,000 tokens)
Meta
Higher BabyVision score (76.3% vs 70.4%)
Higher CharXiv-R score (88.4% vs 85.9%)
Higher Finance Agent v2 score (57.2% vs 38.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (62.1% vs 34.7%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (88.1% vs 73.2%)
Higher OSWorld-Verified score (80.8% vs 73.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (61.5% vs 57.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7-Plus and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7-Plus
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7-Plus vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, Qwen3.7-Plus or Muse Spark 1.1?

Muse Spark 1.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.7-Plus compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7-Plus and Muse Spark 1.1?

Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Qwen3.7-Plus and Muse Spark 1.1?

Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons