Agentic IF Index (Internal)
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Agentic IF Index (Internal)
Agentic IF Index (Internal) Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Meta | — | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.20 |
What is Agentic IF Index (Internal)?
Meta's internal Agentic Instruction-Following Index aggregates evaluations of compliance with tool-use constraints, fine-grained rubrics, compound constraints, long policies, and instructions embedded in structured workflows.
Agentic IF Index (Internal) is a text benchmark evaluating models on instruction following, agents, and tool calling tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.6, with the leader at 0.6.
Compare leaders on the best AI for instruction following, best AI for agents and best AI for tool calling leaderboards.
Current leaders
Muse Spark 1.3 from Meta currently leads the Agentic IF Index (Internal) leaderboard with a score of 0.578 across 1 evaluated AI models.
FAQ
Common questions about the Agentic IF Index (Internal) benchmark and leaderboard.