ARC-E

ARC-E (AI2 Reasoning Challenge - Easy Set) is a subset of grade-school level, multiple-choice science questions that requires knowledge and reasoning capabilities. Part of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge dataset containing 5,197 questions that test scientific reasoning and factual knowledge. The Easy Set contains questions that are answerable by retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making them more accessible than the Challenge Set.

Gemma 2 27B from Google currently leads the ARC-E leaderboard with a score of 0.886 across 8 evaluated AI models.

Paper

GoogleGemma 2 27B leads with 88.6%, followed by GoogleGemma 2 9B at 88.0% and Nous ResearchHermes 3 70B at 83.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ARC-E

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

ARC-E Leaderboard

8 models
ContextCostLicense
127B
29B
3
Nous Research
Nous Research
70B
48B
42B
62B
68B
821B128K$0.40 / $4.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about ARC-E.

What is the ARC-E benchmark?

ARC-E (AI2 Reasoning Challenge - Easy Set) is a subset of grade-school level, multiple-choice science questions that requires knowledge and reasoning capabilities. Part of the AI2 Reasoning Challenge dataset containing 5,197 questions that test scientific reasoning and factual knowledge. The Easy Set contains questions that are answerable by retrieval-based and word co-occurrence algorithms, making them more accessible than the Challenge Set.

What is the ARC-E leaderboard?

The ARC-E leaderboard ranks 8 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Gemma 2 27B by Google leads with a score of 0.886. The average score across all models is 0.794.

What is the highest ARC-E score?

The highest ARC-E score is 0.886, achieved by Gemma 2 27B from Google.

How many models are evaluated on ARC-E?

8 models have been evaluated on the ARC-E benchmark, with 0 verified results and 8 self-reported results.

Where can I find the ARC-E paper?

The ARC-E paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05457. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does ARC-E cover?

ARC-E is categorized under general and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all general
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models