BabyVision

A benchmark for early-stage visual reasoning and perception on child-like vision tasks.

Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI currently leads the BabyVision leaderboard with a score of 0.685 across 4 evaluated AI models.

Moonshot AIKimi K2.6 leads with 68.5%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-27B at 44.6% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-122B-A10B at 40.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BabyVision

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

BabyVision Leaderboard

4 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.95 / $4.00
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about BabyVision.

What is the BabyVision benchmark?

A benchmark for early-stage visual reasoning and perception on child-like vision tasks.

What is the BabyVision leaderboard?

The BabyVision leaderboard ranks 4 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2.6 by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.685. The average score across all models is 0.479.

What is the highest BabyVision score?

The highest BabyVision score is 0.685, achieved by Kimi K2.6 from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on BabyVision?

4 models have been evaluated on the BabyVision benchmark, with 0 verified results and 4 self-reported results.

What categories does BabyVision cover?

BabyVision is categorized under multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all multimodal
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models