BoolQ

BoolQ is a reading comprehension dataset for yes/no questions containing 15,942 naturally occurring examples. Each example consists of a question, passage, and boolean answer, where questions are generated in unprompted and unconstrained settings. The dataset challenges models with complex, non-factoid information requiring entailment-like inference to solve.

Hermes 3 70B from Nous Research currently leads the BoolQ leaderboard with a score of 0.880 across 10 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Nous ResearchHermes 3 70B leads with 88.0%, followed by GoogleGemma 2 27B at 84.8% and MicrosoftPhi-3.5-MoE-instruct at 84.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BoolQ

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

BoolQ Leaderboard

10 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Nous Research
Nous Research
70B
227B
360B
49B
52B
58B
7
Microsoft
Microsoft
4B
84B
92B
98B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about BoolQ.

What is the BoolQ benchmark?

BoolQ is a reading comprehension dataset for yes/no questions containing 15,942 naturally occurring examples. Each example consists of a question, passage, and boolean answer, where questions are generated in unprompted and unconstrained settings. The dataset challenges models with complex, non-factoid information requiring entailment-like inference to solve.

What is the BoolQ leaderboard?

The BoolQ leaderboard ranks 10 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Hermes 3 70B by Nous Research leads with a score of 0.880. The average score across all models is 0.817.

What is the highest BoolQ score?

The highest BoolQ score is 0.880, achieved by Hermes 3 70B from Nous Research.

How many models are evaluated on BoolQ?

10 models have been evaluated on the BoolQ benchmark, with 0 verified results and 10 self-reported results.

Where can I find the BoolQ paper?

The BoolQ paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10044. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does BoolQ cover?

BoolQ is categorized under language and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all language
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

language
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

language
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
75 models