BrowseComp-zh
A high-difficulty benchmark purpose-built to comprehensively evaluate LLM agents on the Chinese web, consisting of 289 multi-hop questions spanning 11 diverse domains including Film & TV, Technology, Medicine, and History. Questions are reverse-engineered from short, objective, and easily verifiable answers, requiring sophisticated reasoning and information reconciliation beyond basic retrieval. The benchmark addresses linguistic, infrastructural, and censorship-related complexities in Chinese web environments.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the BrowseComp-zh leaderboard with a score of 0.703 across 13 evaluated AI models.
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads with 70.3%, followed by Qwen3.5-122B-A10B at 69.9% and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 69.5%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BrowseComp-zh
BrowseComp-zh Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 397B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 4 |  Meituan | 560B | — | — | ||
| 5 |  Zhipu AI | 358B | 205K | $0.60 / $2.20 | ||
| 6 |  DeepSeek | 685B | 164K | $0.26 / $0.38 | ||
| 6 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 8 |  Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 10 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 11 |  MiniMax | 230B | 1.0M | $0.30 / $1.20 | ||
| 12 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 13 | DeepSeek | 671B | 131K | $0.55 / $2.19 |
FAQ
Common questions about BrowseComp-zh.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions