ClawEval-MM
ClawEval-MM is the multimodal variant of ClawEval, evaluating agentic problem solving with visual inputs.
Qwen3.7-Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the ClawEval-MM leaderboard with a score of 0.557 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What ClawEval-MM measures
ClawEval-MM is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, agents, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.6, with the leader reaching 0.6.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for agents and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Qwen3.7-Plus leads with 55.7%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ClawEval-MM
ClawEval-MM Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about ClawEval-MM.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.
Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.