CodeForces
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CodeForces
CodeForces Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.60 / $3.20 | ||
| 1 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.20 | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 6 | OpenAI | 117B | 131K | $0.09 / $0.45 | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 10 | OpenAI | 21B | — | — | ||
| 11 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 12 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.44 | ||
| 14 | DeepSeek | 671B | 131K | $0.55 / $2.19 | ||
| 15 | Google | 12B | — | — | ||
| 16 | Google | 25B | — | — |
What is CodeForces?
A competitive programming benchmark using problems from the CodeForces platform. The benchmark evaluates code generation capabilities of LLMs on algorithmic problems with difficulty ratings ranging from 800 to 2400. Problems cover diverse algorithmic categories including dynamic programming, graph algorithms, data structures, and mathematical problems with standardized evaluation through direct platform submission.
CodeForces is a text benchmark evaluating models on math and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 16 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–3000 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 1.0.
Compare leaders on the best AI for math and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.
Current leaders
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from DeepSeek currently leads the CodeForces leaderboard with a score of 1.000 across 16 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratings
- Authors
- Shanghaoran Quan, Jiaxi Yang, Bowen Yu, Bo Zheng, and 13 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2501.01257
Abstract
With the increasing code reasoning capabilities of existing large language models (LLMs) and breakthroughs in reasoning models like OpenAI o1 and o3, there is a growing need to develop more challenging and comprehensive benchmarks that effectively test their sophisticated competition-level coding abilities. Existing benchmarks, like LiveCodeBench and USACO, fall short due to the unavailability of private test cases, lack of support for special judges, and misaligned execution environments. To bridge this gap, we introduce CodeElo, a standardized competition-level code generation benchmark that effectively addresses all these challenges for the first time. CodeElo benchmark is mainly based on the official CodeForces platform and tries to align with the platform as much as possible. We compile the recent six months of contest problems on CodeForces with detailed information such as contest divisions, problem difficulty ratings, and problem algorithm tags. We introduce a unique judging method in which problems are submitted directly to the platform and develop a reliable Elo rating calculation system that aligns with the platform and is comparable with human participants but has lower variance. By testing on our CodeElo, we provide the Elo ratings of 30 existing popular open-source and 3 proprietary LLMs for the first time. The results show that o1-mini and QwQ-32B-Preview stand out significantly, achieving Elo ratings of 1578 and 1261, respectively, while other models struggle even with the easiest problems, placing in the lowest 25 percent among all human participants. Detailed analysis experiments are also conducted to provide insights into performance across algorithms and comparisons between using C++ and Python, which can suggest directions for future studies.
FAQ
Common questions about the CodeForces benchmark and leaderboard.