CodeForces
A competitive programming benchmark using problems from the CodeForces platform. The benchmark evaluates code generation capabilities of LLMs on algorithmic problems with difficulty ratings ranging from 800 to 2400. Problems cover diverse algorithmic categories including dynamic programming, graph algorithms, data structures, and mathematical problems with standardized evaluation through direct platform submission.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max from DeepSeek currently leads the CodeForces leaderboard with a score of 1.000 across 14 evaluated AI models.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max leads with 1.000, followed by DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Max at 1.000 and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale at 0.900.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CodeForces
CodeForces Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.74 / $3.48 | ||
| 1 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.14 / $0.28 | ||
| 3 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 4 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 6 |  OpenAI | 117B | 131K | $0.09 / $0.45 | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 685B | 164K | $0.26 / $0.38 | ||
| 10 | OpenAI | 21B | 131K | $0.10 / $0.50 | ||
| 11 | DeepSeek | 685B | — | — | ||
| 12 | DeepSeek | 671B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | 128K | $0.10 / $0.30 | ||
| 14 | DeepSeek | 671B | 131K | $0.55 / $2.19 |
FAQ
Common questions about CodeForces.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions