CoWorkBench

CoWorkBench is Qwen's internal cowork benchmark for evaluating long-horizon office and productivity agent tasks across domains such as computer science, finance, law, and medicine.

Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the CoWorkBench leaderboard with a score of 0.672 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.7 Max leads with 67.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CoWorkBench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CoWorkBench Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$1.25 / $3.75
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CoWorkBench.

What is the CoWorkBench benchmark?

CoWorkBench is Qwen's internal cowork benchmark for evaluating long-horizon office and productivity agent tasks across domains such as computer science, finance, law, and medicine.

What is the CoWorkBench leaderboard?

The CoWorkBench leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.672. The average score across all models is 0.672.

What is the highest CoWorkBench score?

The highest CoWorkBench score is 0.672, achieved by Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on CoWorkBench?

1 models have been evaluated on the CoWorkBench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does CoWorkBench cover?

CoWorkBench is categorized under productivity, agents, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all productivity
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
215 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
120 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
91 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
76 models