CritPT

CritPT is a challenging reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating frontier mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.

Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the CritPT leaderboard with a score of 0.114 across 1 evaluated AI models.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.7 Max leads with 11.4%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CritPT

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CritPT Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$1.25 / $3.75
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CritPT.

What is the CritPT benchmark?

CritPT is a challenging reasoning benchmark reported by Qwen for evaluating frontier mathematical and critical problem-solving capability.

What is the CritPT leaderboard?

The CritPT leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.114. The average score across all models is 0.114.

What is the highest CritPT score?

The highest CritPT score is 0.114, achieved by Qwen3.7 Max from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on CritPT?

1 models have been evaluated on the CritPT benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

What categories does CritPT cover?

CritPT is categorized under math and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
215 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
120 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
91 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
76 models