ERQA
Embodied Reasoning Question Answering benchmark consisting of 400 multiple-choice visual questions across spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning for evaluating AI capabilities in physical world interactions
GPT-5 from OpenAI currently leads the ERQA leaderboard with a score of 0.657 across 19 evaluated AI models.
GPT-5 leads with 65.7%, followed by 
Qwen3.6 Plus at 65.7% and Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 64.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ERQA
ERQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 1 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 4 |  Meta | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.45 / $3.49 | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.30 / $1.50 | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 19 | OpenAI | — | 128K | $2.50 / $10.00 |
FAQ
Common questions about ERQA.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions