ERQA
Embodied Reasoning Question Answering benchmark consisting of 400 multiple-choice visual questions across spatial reasoning, trajectory reasoning, action reasoning, state estimation, and multi-view reasoning for evaluating AI capabilities in physical world interactions
GPT-5 from OpenAI currently leads the ERQA leaderboard with a score of 0.657 across 19 evaluated AI models.
What ERQA measures
ERQA is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on reasoning, spatial reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 19 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.5, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for reasoning, best AI for spatial reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- Gemini Robotics: Bringing AI into the Physical World
- Authors
- Gemini Robotics Team, Saminda Abeyruwan, Joshua Ainslie, Jean-Baptiste Alayrac, and 114 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2503.20020
Abstract
Recent advancements in large multimodal models have led to the emergence of remarkable generalist capabilities in digital domains, yet their translation to physical agents such as robots remains a significant challenge. This report introduces a new family of AI models purposefully designed for robotics and built upon the foundation of Gemini 2.0. We present Gemini Robotics, an advanced Vision-Language-Action (VLA) generalist model capable of directly controlling robots. Gemini Robotics executes smooth and reactive movements to tackle a wide range of complex manipulation tasks while also being robust to variations in object types and positions, handling unseen environments as well as following diverse, open vocabulary instructions. We show that with additional fine-tuning, Gemini Robotics can be specialized to new capabilities including solving long-horizon, highly dexterous tasks, learning new short-horizon tasks from as few as 100 demonstrations and adapting to completely novel robot embodiments. This is made possible because Gemini Robotics builds on top of the Gemini Robotics-ER model, the second model we introduce in this work. Gemini Robotics-ER (Embodied Reasoning) extends Gemini's multimodal reasoning capabilities into the physical world, with enhanced spatial and temporal understanding. This enables capabilities relevant to robotics including object detection, pointing, trajectory and grasp prediction, as well as multi-view correspondence and 3D bounding box predictions. We show how this novel combination can support a variety of robotics applications. We also discuss and address important safety considerations related to this new class of robotics foundation models. The Gemini Robotics family marks a substantial step towards developing general-purpose robots that realizes AI's potential in the physical world.
GPT-5 leads with 65.7%, followed by
Qwen3.6 Plus at 65.7% and
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 64.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ERQA
ERQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 4 | Meta | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.30 / $1.50 | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 19 | OpenAI | — | 128K | $2.50 / $10.00 |
FAQ
Common questions about ERQA.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions