GPQA
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on GPQA
GPQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $5.00 / $30.00 | ||
| 1 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Google | — | 1.0M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 4 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 5 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 5 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $5.00 / $30.00 | ||
| 7 | Moonshot AI | 2.8T | 1.0M | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 8 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 9 | xAI | — | 500K | $2.00 / $6.00 | ||
| 10 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 11 | OpenAI | — | 1.0M | $2.50 / $15.00 | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $1.25 / $3.75 | ||
| 12 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.75 / $14.00 | ||
| 14 | OpenAI | — | 1.1M | $1.00 / $6.00 | ||
| 15 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 16 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 17 | Zhipu AI | 753B | 1.0M | $0.95 / $3.00 | ||
| 18 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | 262K | $0.75 / $3.50 | ||
| 19 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 19 | Tencent | 295B | — | — | ||
| 19 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 22 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.32 / $1.28 | ||
| 23 | DeepSeek | 1.6T | 1.0M | $1.60 / $3.20 | ||
| 24 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 25 | Meta | — | — | — | ||
| 26 | ByteDance | — | 256K | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 27 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 397B | — | — | ||
| 27 | xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.25 / $10.00 | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.25 / $10.00 | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 29 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 29 | DeepSeek | 284B | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.20 | ||
| 35 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $0.75 / $4.50 | ||
| 36 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 37 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 38 | xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 39 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 40 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 40 | 550B | — | — | |||
| 42 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.25 / $1.50 | ||
| 43 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | — | — | ||
| 44 | — | — | — | |||
| 45 | Zhipu AI | 754B | 200K | $1.40 / $4.40 | ||
| 46 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 47 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 47 | Zhipu AI | 358B | — | — | ||
| 47 | xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 50 | OpenAI | — | 400K | $5.00 / $30.00 |
What is GPQA?
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
GPQA is a text benchmark evaluating models on physics, reasoning, general, biology, and chemistry tasks. LLM Stats tracks 232 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for physics, best AI for reasoning, best AI for general, best AI for biology and best AI for chemistry leaderboards.
Current leaders
GPT-5.6 Sol from OpenAI currently leads the GPQA leaderboard with a score of 0.946 across 232 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmark
- Authors
- David Rein, Betty Li Hou, Asa Cooper Stickland, Jackson Petty, and 4 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2311.12022
Abstract
We present GPQA, a challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. We ensure that the questions are high-quality and extremely difficult: experts who have or are pursuing PhDs in the corresponding domains reach 65% accuracy (74% when discounting clear mistakes the experts identified in retrospect), while highly skilled non-expert validators only reach 34% accuracy, despite spending on average over 30 minutes with unrestricted access to the web (i.e., the questions are "Google-proof"). The questions are also difficult for state-of-the-art AI systems, with our strongest GPT-4 based baseline achieving 39% accuracy. If we are to use future AI systems to help us answer very hard questions, for example, when developing new scientific knowledge, we need to develop scalable oversight methods that enable humans to supervise their outputs, which may be difficult even if the supervisors are themselves skilled and knowledgeable. The difficulty of GPQA both for skilled non-experts and frontier AI systems should enable realistic scalable oversight experiments, which we hope can help devise ways for human experts to reliably get truthful information from AI systems that surpass human capabilities.
FAQ
Common questions about the GPQA benchmark and leaderboard.