GroundUI-1K

A subset of GroundUI-18K for UI grounding evaluation, where models must predict action coordinates on screenshots based on single-step instructions across web, desktop, and mobile platforms.

Nova Pro from Amazon currently leads the GroundUI-1K leaderboard with a score of 0.814 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

AmazonNova Pro leads with 81.4%, followed by AmazonNova Lite at 80.2%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on GroundUI-1K

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

GroundUI-1K Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Amazon
Amazon
300K$0.80 / $3.20
2
Amazon
Amazon
300K$0.06 / $0.24
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about GroundUI-1K.

What is the GroundUI-1K benchmark?

A subset of GroundUI-18K for UI grounding evaluation, where models must predict action coordinates on screenshots based on single-step instructions across web, desktop, and mobile platforms.

What is the GroundUI-1K leaderboard?

The GroundUI-1K leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Nova Pro by Amazon leads with a score of 0.814. The average score across all models is 0.808.

What is the highest GroundUI-1K score?

The highest GroundUI-1K score is 0.814, achieved by Nova Pro from Amazon.

How many models are evaluated on GroundUI-1K?

2 models have been evaluated on the GroundUI-1K benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the GroundUI-1K paper?

The GroundUI-1K paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.17918. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does GroundUI-1K cover?

GroundUI-1K is categorized under grounding, multimodal, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all grounding
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
74 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

multimodalmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

multimodalmultimodal
47 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

multimodalmultimodal
36 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

multimodalmultimodal
34 models
AI2D

AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.

multimodalmultimodal
32 models