LAB-Bench Practical
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on LAB-Bench Practical
LAB-Bench Practical Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | xAI | — | 500K | $2.00 / $6.00 |
What is LAB-Bench Practical?
LAB-Bench practical is a public multiple-choice evaluation of everyday wet-lab and research skills, covering protocol troubleshooting, sequence reasoning, and cloning scenarios. Distinct from labbench2.
LAB-Bench Practical is a text benchmark evaluating models on science, healthcare, and biology tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for science, best AI for healthcare and best AI for biology leaderboards.
Current leaders
Grok 4.7 from xAI currently leads the LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard with a score of 0.768 across 1 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research
- Authors
- Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, and 5 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2407.10362
Abstract
There is widespread optimism that frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) and LLM-augmented systems have the potential to rapidly accelerate scientific discovery across disciplines. Today, many benchmarks exist to measure LLM knowledge and reasoning on textbook-style science questions, but few if any benchmarks are designed to evaluate language model performance on practical tasks required for scientific research, such as literature search, protocol planning, and data analysis. As a step toward building such benchmarks, we introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench), a broad dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities, including recall and reasoning over literature, interpretation of figures, access and navigation of databases, and comprehension and manipulation of DNA and protein sequences. Importantly, in contrast to previous scientific benchmarks, we expect that an AI system that can achieve consistently high scores on the more difficult LAB-Bench tasks would serve as a useful assistant for researchers in areas such as literature search and molecular cloning. As an initial assessment of the emergent scientific task capabilities of frontier language models, we measure performance of several against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers. We will continue to update and expand LAB-Bench over time, and expect it to serve as a useful tool in the development of automated research systems going forward. A public subset of LAB-Bench is available for use at the following URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/futurehouse/lab-bench
FAQ
Common questions about the LAB-Bench Practical benchmark and leaderboard.