The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LAB-Bench Practical

PaperImplementation

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on LAB-Bench Practical

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

LAB-Bench Practical Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
1—500K$2.00 / $6.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is LAB-Bench Practical?

LAB-Bench practical is a public multiple-choice evaluation of everyday wet-lab and research skills, covering protocol troubleshooting, sequence reasoning, and cloning scenarios. Distinct from labbench2.

LAB-Bench Practical is a text benchmark evaluating models on science, healthcare, and biology tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for science, best AI for healthcare and best AI for biology leaderboards.

Current leaders

Grok 4.7 from xAI currently leads the LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard with a score of 0.768 across 1 evaluated AI models.

1Grok 4.7xAI76.8%

Source paper

Title
LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research
Authors
Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, and 5 others
Published
Abstract

There is widespread optimism that frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) and LLM-augmented systems have the potential to rapidly accelerate scientific discovery across disciplines. Today, many benchmarks exist to measure LLM knowledge and reasoning on textbook-style science questions, but few if any benchmarks are designed to evaluate language model performance on practical tasks required for scientific research, such as literature search, protocol planning, and data analysis. As a step toward building such benchmarks, we introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench), a broad dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities, including recall and reasoning over literature, interpretation of figures, access and navigation of databases, and comprehension and manipulation of DNA and protein sequences. Importantly, in contrast to previous scientific benchmarks, we expect that an AI system that can achieve consistently high scores on the more difficult LAB-Bench tasks would serve as a useful assistant for researchers in areas such as literature search and molecular cloning. As an initial assessment of the emergent scientific task capabilities of frontier language models, we measure performance of several against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers. We will continue to update and expand LAB-Bench over time, and expect it to serve as a useful tool in the development of automated research systems going forward. A public subset of LAB-Bench is available for use at the following URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/futurehouse/lab-bench

FAQ

Common questions about the LAB-Bench Practical benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the LAB-Bench Practical benchmark?

LAB-Bench practical is a public multiple-choice evaluation of everyday wet-lab and research skills, covering protocol troubleshooting, sequence reasoning, and cloning scenarios. Distinct from labbench2.

What is the LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard?

The LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Grok 4.7 by xAI leads with a score of 0.768. The average score across all models is 0.768.

What is the highest LAB-Bench Practical score?

The highest LAB-Bench Practical score is 0.768, achieved by Grok 4.7 from xAI.

How many models are evaluated on LAB-Bench Practical?

1 models have been evaluated on the LAB-Bench Practical benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the LAB-Bench Practical paper?

The LAB-Bench Practical paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10362. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the LAB-Bench Practical dataset?

The LAB-Bench Practical dataset is available at https://github.com/Future-House/LAB-Bench.

What categories does LAB-Bench Practical cover?

LAB-Bench Practical is categorized under science, healthcare, and biology. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Which model offers the best value on LAB-Bench Practical?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Grok 4.7 from xAI is the cheapest, at $2.00 per million input tokens with a score of 0.768.

How recent are the LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard results?

The LAB-Bench Practical leaderboard was last updated in October 2026 and currently includes 1 evaluated models.