LongVideoBench

LongVideoBench is a question-answering benchmark featuring video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long. It includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with subtitles across diverse themes and 6,678 human-annotated multiple-choice questions in 17 fine-grained categories for comprehensive evaluation of long-term multimodal understanding.

Kimi K2.5 from Moonshot AI currently leads the LongVideoBench leaderboard with a score of 0.798 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Moonshot AIKimi K2.5 leads with 79.8%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct at 54.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on LongVideoBench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

LongVideoBench Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about LongVideoBench.

What is the LongVideoBench benchmark?

LongVideoBench is a question-answering benchmark featuring video-language interleaved inputs up to an hour long. It includes 3,763 varying-length web-collected videos with subtitles across diverse themes and 6,678 human-annotated multiple-choice questions in 17 fine-grained categories for comprehensive evaluation of long-term multimodal understanding.

What is the LongVideoBench leaderboard?

The LongVideoBench leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Kimi K2.5 by Moonshot AI leads with a score of 0.798. The average score across all models is 0.673.

What is the highest LongVideoBench score?

The highest LongVideoBench score is 0.798, achieved by Kimi K2.5 from Moonshot AI.

How many models are evaluated on LongVideoBench?

2 models have been evaluated on the LongVideoBench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the LongVideoBench paper?

The LongVideoBench paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.15754. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does LongVideoBench cover?

LongVideoBench is categorized under vision, long context, and multimodal. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all vision
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
75 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

visionmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

visionmultimodal
49 models
nolima
long context
44 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

visionmultimodal
36 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

visionmultimodal
36 models