MedXpertQA

A comprehensive benchmark to evaluate expert-level medical knowledge and advanced reasoning, featuring 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. Includes both text-only and multimodal subsets with expert-level exam questions incorporating diverse medical images and rich clinical information.

Muse Spark from Meta currently leads the MedXpertQA leaderboard with a score of 0.784 across 9 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MetaMuse Spark leads with 78.4%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-122B-A10B at 67.3% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-27B at 62.4%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MedXpertQA

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MedXpertQA Leaderboard

9 models
ContextCostLicense
1
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
531B262K$0.14 / $0.40
625B262K$0.13 / $0.40
78B
85B
94B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MedXpertQA.

What is the MedXpertQA benchmark?

A comprehensive benchmark to evaluate expert-level medical knowledge and advanced reasoning, featuring 4,460 questions spanning 17 specialties and 11 body systems. Includes both text-only and multimodal subsets with expert-level exam questions incorporating diverse medical images and rich clinical information.

What is the MedXpertQA leaderboard?

The MedXpertQA leaderboard ranks 9 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Muse Spark by Meta leads with a score of 0.784. The average score across all models is 0.511.

What is the highest MedXpertQA score?

The highest MedXpertQA score is 0.784, achieved by Muse Spark from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on MedXpertQA?

9 models have been evaluated on the MedXpertQA benchmark, with 0 verified results and 9 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MedXpertQA paper?

The MedXpertQA paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.18362. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MedXpertQA cover?

MedXpertQA is categorized under healthcare, multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all healthcare
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

healthcare
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

healthcare
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models