MILU
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MILU
MILU Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $4.00 / $20.00 | ||
| 2 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $2.00 / $10.00 | ||
| 3 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $0.10 / $0.50 |
What is MILU?
Multi-task Indic Language Understanding (MILU) covers 11 languages—10 Indic languages (Bengali, Gujarati, Hindi, Kannada, Malayalam, Marathi, Odia, Punjabi, Tamil, and Telugu) and English—and tests culturally grounded knowledge comprehension.
MILU is a text benchmark evaluating models on language, reasoning, and general tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.9, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for language, best AI for reasoning and best AI for general leaderboards.
Current leaders
Claude Opus 5.5 from Anthropic currently leads the MILU leaderboard with a score of 0.931 across 3 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- MILU: A Multi-task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark
- Authors
- Sshubam Verma, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Vishwajeet Kumar, Rudra Murthy, and 1 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2411.02538
Abstract
Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) in low-resource and linguistically diverse languages remains a significant challenge in NLP, particularly for languages using non-Latin scripts like those spoken in India. Existing benchmarks predominantly focus on English, leaving substantial gaps in assessing LLM capabilities in these languages. We introduce MILU, a Multi task Indic Language Understanding Benchmark, a comprehensive evaluation benchmark designed to address this gap. MILU spans 8 domains and 41 subjects across 11 Indic languages, reflecting both general and culturally specific knowledge. With an India-centric design, incorporates material from regional and state-level examinations, covering topics such as local history, arts, festivals, and laws, alongside standard subjects like science and mathematics. We evaluate over 42 LLMs, and find that current LLMs struggle with MILU, with GPT-4o achieving the highest average accuracy at 74 percent. Open multilingual models outperform language-specific fine-tuned models, which perform only slightly better than random baselines. Models also perform better in high resource languages as compared to low resource ones. Domain-wise analysis indicates that models perform poorly in culturally relevant areas like Arts and Humanities, Law and Governance compared to general fields like STEM. To the best of our knowledge, MILU is the first of its kind benchmark focused on Indic languages, serving as a crucial step towards comprehensive cultural evaluation. All code, benchmarks, and artifacts are publicly available to foster open research.
FAQ
Common questions about the MILU benchmark and leaderboard.