MMBench
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
Step3-VL-10B from StepFun currently leads the MMBench leaderboard with a score of 0.918 across 9 evaluated AI models.
What MMBench measures
MMBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 9 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.8, with the leader reaching 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?
- Authors
- Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, and 8 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2307.06281
Abstract
Large vision-language models (VLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress, exhibiting impressive multimodal perception and reasoning abilities. However, effectively evaluating these large VLMs remains a major challenge, hindering future development in this domain. Traditional benchmarks like VQAv2 or COCO Caption provide quantitative performance measurements but lack fine-grained ability assessment and robust evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, subjective benchmarks, such as OwlEval, offer comprehensive evaluations of a model's abilities by incorporating human labor, which is not scalable and may display significant bias. In response to these challenges, we propose MMBench, a bilingual benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of VLMs. MMBench methodically develops a comprehensive evaluation pipeline, primarily comprised of the following key features: 1. MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes, surpassing existing similar benchmarks in terms of the number and variety of evaluation questions and abilities; 2. MMBench introduces a rigorous CircularEval strategy and incorporates large language models to convert free-form predictions into pre-defined choices, which helps to yield accurate evaluation results for models with limited instruction-following capabilities. 3. MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions, enabling an apples-to-apples comparison of VLMs' performance under a bilingual context. To summarize, MMBench is a systematically designed objective benchmark for a robust and holistic evaluation of vision-language models. We hope MMBench will assist the research community in better evaluating their models and facilitate future progress in this area. The evalutation code of MMBench has been integrated into VLMEvalKit: https://github.com/open-compass/VLMEvalKit.
Step3-VL-10B leads with 91.8%, followed by
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at 88.0% and Phi-4-multimodal-instruct at 86.7%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMBench
MMBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | StepFun | 10B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Microsoft | 6B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Microsoft | 4B | — | — | ||
| 7 | DeepSeek | 16B | — | — | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 27B | — | — | ||
| 9 | DeepSeek | 3B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about MMBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions