MMBench
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMBench
MMBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | StepFun | 10B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Microsoft | 6B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Microsoft | 4B | — | — | ||
| 7 | DeepSeek | 16B | — | — | ||
| 8 | DeepSeek | 27B | — | — | ||
| 9 | DeepSeek | 3B | — | — |
What is MMBench?
A bilingual benchmark for assessing multi-modal capabilities of vision-language models through multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese, providing systematic evaluation across diverse vision-language tasks with robust metrics.
MMBench is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 9 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Current leaders
Step3-VL-10B from StepFun currently leads the MMBench leaderboard with a score of 0.918 across 9 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?
- Authors
- Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, and 8 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2307.06281
Abstract
Large vision-language models (VLMs) have recently achieved remarkable progress, exhibiting impressive multimodal perception and reasoning abilities. However, effectively evaluating these large VLMs remains a major challenge, hindering future development in this domain. Traditional benchmarks like VQAv2 or COCO Caption provide quantitative performance measurements but lack fine-grained ability assessment and robust evaluation metrics. Meanwhile, subjective benchmarks, such as OwlEval, offer comprehensive evaluations of a model's abilities by incorporating human labor, which is not scalable and may display significant bias. In response to these challenges, we propose MMBench, a bilingual benchmark for assessing the multi-modal capabilities of VLMs. MMBench methodically develops a comprehensive evaluation pipeline, primarily comprised of the following key features: 1. MMBench is meticulously curated with well-designed quality control schemes, surpassing existing similar benchmarks in terms of the number and variety of evaluation questions and abilities; 2. MMBench introduces a rigorous CircularEval strategy and incorporates large language models to convert free-form predictions into pre-defined choices, which helps to yield accurate evaluation results for models with limited instruction-following capabilities. 3. MMBench incorporates multiple-choice questions in both English and Chinese versions, enabling an apples-to-apples comparison of VLMs' performance under a bilingual context. To summarize, MMBench is a systematically designed objective benchmark for a robust and holistic evaluation of vision-language models. We hope MMBench will assist the research community in better evaluating their models and facilitate future progress in this area. The evalutation code of MMBench has been integrated into VLMEvalKit: https://github.com/open-compass/VLMEvalKit.
FAQ
Common questions about the MMBench benchmark and leaderboard.