MMLU (CoT)

Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.

Llama 3.1 405B Instruct from Meta currently leads the MMLU (CoT) leaderboard with a score of 0.886 across 3 evaluated AI models.

Paper

MetaLlama 3.1 405B Instruct leads with 88.6%, followed by MetaLlama 3.1 70B Instruct at 86.0% and MetaLlama 3.1 8B Instruct at 73.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMLU (CoT)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MMLU (CoT) Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1405B128K$0.89 / $0.89
270B128K$0.20 / $0.20
38B131K$0.03 / $0.03
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MMLU (CoT).

What is the MMLU (CoT) benchmark?

Chain-of-Thought variant of the Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark, evaluating language models across 57 tasks including elementary mathematics, US history, computer science, law, and other professional and academic subjects. This version uses chain-of-thought prompting to elicit step-by-step reasoning.

What is the MMLU (CoT) leaderboard?

The MMLU (CoT) leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Llama 3.1 405B Instruct by Meta leads with a score of 0.886. The average score across all models is 0.825.

What is the highest MMLU (CoT) score?

The highest MMLU (CoT) score is 0.886, achieved by Llama 3.1 405B Instruct from Meta.

How many models are evaluated on MMLU (CoT)?

3 models have been evaluated on the MMLU (CoT) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MMLU (CoT) paper?

The MMLU (CoT) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.03300. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MMLU (CoT) cover?

MMLU (CoT) is categorized under finance, general, healthcare, language, legal, math, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all finance
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

finance
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

finance
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
74 models