Best AI for Finance in 2026

Rankings of the best AI models for finance and accounting. Compare models by financial analysis, economic reasoning, and accounting capabilities.

80 models25 benchmarks
Updated 80 models reviewedMethodology

The short answer

The best AI for finance right now is Qwen3.7 Max by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team, followed by Qwen3.6 Plus — ranked by financial analysis, economic reasoning, and accounting benchmarks.

Best Overall
Qwen3.7 MaxHighest combined arena + benchmark score
Best Value
MiniMax M2.1Cheapest model still in the top 10
Best Free
Qwen3.7 MaxStrongest model with a usable free tier
Best Open-Source
Qwen3.7 MaxTop model you can download and self-host

At a glance

  • Qwen3.7 Max$1.25 / $3.75

    Alibaba's newest — strongest open-weight Asian frontier

    Strength
    Excellent multilingual coverage (50+ languages)
    Watch out
    Western provider coverage lags
  • Qwen3.6 Plus$0.50 / $3.00

    Mature Qwen generation — strong all-rounder

    Strength
    Open weights, broad language support
    Watch out
    3.7 line now ahead on the hardest tasks
  • Qwen3.5-397B-A17B$0.60 / $3.60

    Earlier Qwen 3 — still capable, especially MoE variants

    Strength
    MoE architecture gives strong quality at low active-parameter cost
    Watch out
    Newer versions lead it
  • MiniMax M2.1$0.30 / $1.20

    Lean Chinese frontier — strong on long context

    Strength
    1M+ context window with usable recall
    Watch out
    Limited Western provider coverage
  • Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.40 / $3.20

    Earlier Qwen 3 — still capable, especially MoE variants

    Strength
    MoE architecture gives strong quality at low active-parameter cost
    Watch out
    Newer versions lead it
  • Moonshot AI — frontier-adjacent quality with strong long context

    Strength
    Consistently top-5 on research and long-context retrieval
    Watch out
    Newer to Western providers; latency varies
  • Qwen3.6-27B$0.60 / $3.60

    Mature Qwen generation — strong all-rounder

    Strength
    Open weights, broad language support
    Watch out
    3.7 line now ahead on the hardest tasks

Capsule reviews of the top models

  1. 01
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

    Alibaba's newest — strongest open-weight Asian frontier

    Strengths
    • Excellent multilingual coverage (50+ languages)
    • Aggressive open-weight releases
    Watch-outs
    • Western provider coverage lags

    When to useMultilingual workloads; open-weight evaluations.

    Input
    $1.25/ M tokens
    Output
    $3.75/ M tokens
    Context
    1.0Mtokens
    License
    proprietary
  2. 02
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

    Mature Qwen generation — strong all-rounder

    Strengths
    • Open weights, broad language support
    • Competitive on coding benchmarks
    Watch-outs
    • 3.7 line now ahead on the hardest tasks

    When to useCross-language deployment; cost-throttled work.

    Input
    $0.50/ M tokens
    Output
    $3.00/ M tokens
    Context
    1.0Mtokens
    License
    proprietary
  3. 03
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

    Earlier Qwen 3 — still capable, especially MoE variants

    Strengths
    • MoE architecture gives strong quality at low active-parameter cost
    Watch-outs
    • Newer versions lead it

    When to useOpen-weight evaluation; specific fine-tunes.

    Input
    $0.60/ M tokens
    Output
    $3.60/ M tokens
    Context
    262Ktokens
    License
    apache_2_0
  4. 04
    MiniMax

    Lean Chinese frontier — strong on long context

    Strengths
    • 1M+ context window with usable recall
    • Cheap per-token at quality
    Watch-outs
    • Limited Western provider coverage

    When to useLong-document workflows where price-per-million-tokens matters.

    Input
    $0.30/ M tokens
    Output
    $1.20/ M tokens
    Context
    1.0Mtokens
    License
    mit
  5. 05
    Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

    Earlier Qwen 3 — still capable, especially MoE variants

    Strengths
    • MoE architecture gives strong quality at low active-parameter cost
    Watch-outs
    • Newer versions lead it

    When to useOpen-weight evaluation; specific fine-tunes.

    Input
    $0.40/ M tokens
    Output
    $3.20/ M tokens
    Context
    262Ktokens
    License
    apache_2_0
  6. 06
    Moonshot AI

    Moonshot AI — frontier-adjacent quality with strong long context

    Strengths
    • Consistently top-5 on research and long-context retrieval
    • Aggressive context-window engineering
    Watch-outs
    • Newer to Western providers; latency varies

    When to useLong-context document work; research synthesis.

As of June 2026, Qwen3.7 Max leads finance benchmarks with a score of 60.8, followed by Qwen3.6 Plus (55.0) and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (53.9). Financial accuracy is critical — our rankings penalize models that confidently produce incorrect financial information over those that appropriately express uncertainty.

Ranked by 25 benchmarks including CFA, CPA, and FRM exam question sets, financial statement comprehension, and economic reasoning problems testing both factual recall and analytical judgment.

  • Yes, for structured tasks. Top models handle ratio calculations, trend identification, financial statement analysis, and comparative analysis well. They're less reliable on forward-looking projections, jurisdiction-specific regulatory questions, and judgment calls that require market intuition. Always verify outputs.

  • Top models score above passing thresholds on CFA Level 1 and CPA exams. However, exam performance reflects pattern matching on question formats, not necessarily deep financial understanding. Real-world financial analysis requires judgment that exam scores don't capture.

  • AI can help research and analyze data, but should never be the sole basis for investment decisions. Models may cite outdated information, misinterpret market conditions, or miss context a human advisor would catch. Use AI for data gathering and preliminary analysis, not final investment decisions.

  • Models with strong performance on CPA-style questions and financial statement tasks. Importantly, consider whether the model handles tabular data well — not all top-ranked general models can process spreadsheets and financial tables accurately. Test with your actual document types.

  • Top models can analyze balance sheets, income statements, and cash flow statements, extracting key metrics and identifying trends. Performance is best when the data is provided as structured text. For scanned documents, combine with a vision model that has strong OCR capabilities.