MMMU-Pro (with tools)

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMMU-Pro (with tools)

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MMMU-Pro (with tools) Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$5.00 / $30.00
2
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$2.50 / $15.00
3
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$1.00 / $6.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is MMMU-Pro (with tools)?

MMMU-Pro variant evaluated with tool access enabled.

MMMU-Pro (with tools) is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, general, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning, best AI for general and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Current leaders

GPT-5.6 Sol from OpenAI currently leads the MMMU-Pro (with tools) leaderboard with a score of 0.846 across 3 evaluated AI models.

1GPT-5.6 SolOpenAI84.6%
2GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI82.0%
3GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI79.5%

Source paper

Title
MMMU-Pro: A More Robust Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding Benchmark
Authors
Xiang Yue, Tianyu Zheng, Yuansheng Ni, Yubo Wang, and 9 others
Published
Abstract

This paper introduces MMMU-Pro, a robust version of the Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning (MMMU) benchmark. MMMU-Pro rigorously assesses multimodal models' true understanding and reasoning capabilities through a three-step process based on MMMU: (1) filtering out questions answerable by text-only models, (2) augmenting candidate options, and (3) introducing a vision-only input setting where questions are embedded within images. This setting challenges AI to truly "see" and "read" simultaneously, testing a fundamental human cognitive skill of seamlessly integrating visual and textual information. Results show that model performance is substantially lower on MMMU-Pro than on MMMU, ranging from 16.8% to 26.9% across models. We explore the impact of OCR prompts and Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning, finding that OCR prompts have minimal effect while CoT generally improves performance. MMMU-Pro provides a more rigorous evaluation tool, closely mimicking real-world scenarios and offering valuable directions for future research in multimodal AI.

FAQ

Common questions about the MMMU-Pro (with tools) benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the MMMU-Pro (with tools) benchmark?

MMMU-Pro variant evaluated with tool access enabled.

What is the MMMU-Pro (with tools) leaderboard?

The MMMU-Pro (with tools) leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, GPT-5.6 Sol by OpenAI leads with a score of 0.846. The average score across all models is 0.820.

What is the highest MMMU-Pro (with tools) score?

The highest MMMU-Pro (with tools) score is 0.846, achieved by GPT-5.6 Sol from OpenAI.

How many models are evaluated on MMMU-Pro (with tools)?

3 models have been evaluated on the MMMU-Pro (with tools) benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MMMU-Pro (with tools) paper?

The MMMU-Pro (with tools) paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.02813. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MMMU-Pro (with tools) cover?

MMMU-Pro (with tools) is categorized under multimodal, reasoning, general, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

What's the difference between MMMU-Pro (with tools) and MMMU-Pro?

MMMU-Pro (with tools) is a variant of MMMU-Pro. See the MMMU-Pro leaderboard for the broader benchmark and per-model comparison.

Which model offers the best value on MMMU-Pro (with tools)?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, GPT-5.6 Luna from OpenAI is the cheapest, at $1.00 per million input tokens with a score of 0.795.

How recent are the MMMU-Pro (with tools) leaderboard results?

The MMMU-Pro (with tools) leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 3 evaluated models.