MMT-Bench

MMT-Bench is a comprehensive multimodal benchmark for evaluating Large Vision-Language Models towards multitask AGI. It comprises 31,325 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios such as vehicle driving and embodied navigation, covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks in multimodal understanding.

DeepSeek VL2 from DeepSeek currently leads the MMT-Bench leaderboard with a score of 0.636 across 4 evaluated AI models.

Paper

DeepSeekDeepSeek VL2 leads with 63.6%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct at 63.6% and DeepSeekDeepSeek VL2 Small at 62.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MMT-Bench

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

MMT-Bench Leaderboard

4 models
ContextCostLicense
1
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
27B
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B
316B
43B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about MMT-Bench.

What is the MMT-Bench benchmark?

MMT-Bench is a comprehensive multimodal benchmark for evaluating Large Vision-Language Models towards multitask AGI. It comprises 31,325 meticulously curated multi-choice visual questions from various multimodal scenarios such as vehicle driving and embodied navigation, covering 32 core meta-tasks and 162 subtasks in multimodal understanding.

What is the MMT-Bench leaderboard?

The MMT-Bench leaderboard ranks 4 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, DeepSeek VL2 by DeepSeek leads with a score of 0.636. The average score across all models is 0.608.

What is the highest MMT-Bench score?

The highest MMT-Bench score is 0.636, achieved by DeepSeek VL2 from DeepSeek.

How many models are evaluated on MMT-Bench?

4 models have been evaluated on the MMT-Bench benchmark, with 0 verified results and 4 self-reported results.

Where can I find the MMT-Bench paper?

The MMT-Bench paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.16006. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does MMT-Bench cover?

MMT-Bench is categorized under vision, general, multimodal, and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all vision
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

general
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

general
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

general
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
75 models