MobileMiniWob++_SR
MobileMiniWob++ SR (Success Rate) is an adaptation of the MiniWob++ web interaction benchmark for mobile Android environments within AndroidWorld. It comprises 92 web interaction tasks adapted for touch-based mobile interfaces, evaluating agents' ability to navigate and interact with web applications on mobile devices.
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the MobileMiniWob++_SR leaderboard with a score of 0.914 across 2 evaluated AI models.
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct leads with 91.4%, followed by Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at 68.0%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MobileMiniWob++_SR
MobileMiniWob++_SR Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about MobileMiniWob++_SR.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
BrowseComp is a benchmark comprising 1,266 questions that challenge AI agents to persistently navigate the internet in search of hard-to-find, entangled information. The benchmark measures agents' ability to exercise persistence in information gathering, demonstrate creativity in web navigation, and find concise, verifiable answers. Despite the difficulty of the questions, BrowseComp is simple and easy-to-use, as predicted answers are short and easily verifiable against reference answers.
Terminal-Bench 2.0 is an updated benchmark for testing AI agents' tool use ability to operate a computer via terminal. It evaluates how well models can handle real-world, end-to-end tasks autonomously, including compiling code, training models, setting up servers, system administration, security tasks, data science workflows, and cybersecurity vulnerabilities.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.