OmniDocBench
OmniDocBench evaluates multimodal models on document understanding tasks such as OCR, layout parsing, and structured document comprehension.
MiMo-V2.5 from Xiaomi currently leads the OmniDocBench leaderboard with a score of 0.872 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What OmniDocBench measures
OmniDocBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on document understanding, multimodal, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.9, with the leader reaching 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for document understanding, best AI for multimodal and best AI for vision leaderboards.
MiMo-V2.5 leads with 87.2%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OmniDocBench
OmniDocBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Xiaomi | 311B | 1.0M | $0.17 / $0.34 |
FAQ
Common questions about OmniDocBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.