OmniMath

A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language Models containing 4,428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation, categorized into over 33 sub-domains and spanning more than 10 distinct difficulty levels

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus from Microsoft currently leads the OmniMath leaderboard with a score of 0.819 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper
About this benchmark

What OmniMath measures

OmniMath is a text benchmark that evaluates large language models on math and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.8, with the leader reaching 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for math and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Publication

Paper
Omni-MATH: A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark For Large Language Models
Authors
Bofei Gao, Feifan Song, Zhe Yang, Zefan Cai, and 16 others
Published

Abstract

Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to significant breakthroughs in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, existing benchmarks like GSM8K or MATH are now being solved with high accuracy (e.g., OpenAI o1 achieves 94.8\% on MATH dataset), indicating their inadequacy for truly challenging these models. To bridge this gap, we propose a comprehensive and challenging benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' mathematical reasoning at the Olympiad level. Unlike existing Olympiad-related benchmarks, our dataset focuses exclusively on mathematics and comprises a vast collection of 4428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation. These problems are meticulously categorized into over 33 sub-domains and span more than 10 distinct difficulty levels, enabling a holistic assessment of model performance in Olympiad-mathematical reasoning. Furthermore, we conducted an in-depth analysis based on this benchmark. Our experimental results show that even the most advanced models, OpenAI o1-mini and OpenAI o1-preview, struggle with highly challenging Olympiad-level problems, with 60.54\% and 52.55\% accuracy, highlighting significant challenges in Olympiad-level mathematical reasoning.

MicrosoftPhi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 81.9%, followed by MicrosoftPhi 4 Reasoning at 76.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OmniMath

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

OmniMath Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
114B
214B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about OmniMath.

What is the OmniMath benchmark?

A Universal Olympiad Level Mathematic Benchmark for Large Language Models containing 4,428 competition-level problems with rigorous human annotation, categorized into over 33 sub-domains and spanning more than 10 distinct difficulty levels

What is the OmniMath leaderboard?

The OmniMath leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus by Microsoft leads with a score of 0.819. The average score across all models is 0.792.

What is the highest OmniMath score?

The highest OmniMath score is 0.819, achieved by Phi 4 Reasoning Plus from Microsoft.

How many models are evaluated on OmniMath?

2 models have been evaluated on the OmniMath benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the OmniMath paper?

The OmniMath paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07985. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does OmniMath cover?

OmniMath is categorized under math and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What is the best open-source model on OmniMath?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus by Microsoft is the top-ranked open-source model on OmniMath, with a score of 0.819 (rank #1).

How recent are the OmniMath leaderboard results?

The OmniMath leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 2 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all math
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
224 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

math
127 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

math
114 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

math
100 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
100 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

mathmultimodal
82 models