OSWorld-Verified

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OSWorld-Verified

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

OSWorld-Verified Leaderboard

21 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$10.00 / $50.00
21.0M$5.00 / $25.00
31.0M$1.50 / $7.50
41.0M$3.00 / $15.00
51.0M$1.25 / $4.25
6
7
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$5.00 / $30.00
81.0M$1.50 / $9.00
91.0M$5.00 / $25.00
10
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.0M$2.50 / $15.00
111.0M$0.30 / $2.50
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.32 / $1.28
13
Moonshot AI
Moonshot AI
1.0T262K$0.75 / $3.50
14400K$0.75 / $4.50
15
MiniMax
MiniMax
1.0M$0.30 / $1.20
16400K$1.75 / $14.00
17
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
18
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B
19
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
20
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
21400K$0.20 / $1.25
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is OSWorld-Verified?

OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.

OSWorld-Verified is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, general, agents, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 21 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.8.

Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for general, best AI for agents and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Current leaders

Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic currently leads the OSWorld-Verified leaderboard with a score of 0.850 across 21 evaluated AI models.

1Claude Fable 5Anthropic85.0%
2Claude Opus 4.8Anthropic83.4%
3Gemini 3.6 FlashGoogle83.0%
OSSKimi K2.6#13 open-weight73.1%

Source paper

Title
OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
Authors
Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, and 13 others
Published
Abstract

Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.

FAQ

Common questions about the OSWorld-Verified benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the OSWorld-Verified benchmark?

OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.

What is the OSWorld-Verified leaderboard?

The OSWorld-Verified leaderboard ranks 21 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Fable 5 by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.850. The average score across all models is 0.715.

What is the highest OSWorld-Verified score?

The highest OSWorld-Verified score is 0.850, achieved by Claude Fable 5 from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on OSWorld-Verified?

21 models have been evaluated on the OSWorld-Verified benchmark, with 0 verified results and 21 self-reported results.

Where can I find the OSWorld-Verified paper?

The OSWorld-Verified paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.07972. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does OSWorld-Verified cover?

OSWorld-Verified is categorized under multimodal, general, agents, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

What's the difference between OSWorld-Verified and OSWorld?

OSWorld-Verified is a variant of OSWorld. See the OSWorld leaderboard for the broader benchmark and per-model comparison.

What is the best open-source model on OSWorld-Verified?

Kimi K2.6 by Moonshot AI is the top-ranked open-source model on OSWorld-Verified, with a score of 0.731 (rank #13).

Which model offers the best value on OSWorld-Verified?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Muse Spark 1.1 from Meta is the cheapest, at $1.25 per million input tokens with a score of 0.808.

How recent are the OSWorld-Verified leaderboard results?

The OSWorld-Verified leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 21 evaluated models.