OSWorld
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OSWorld
OSWorld Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ByteDance | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | ByteDance | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 4 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 7 | Zhipu AI | — | — | — | ||
| 8 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 9 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $1.00 / $5.00 | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 19 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 20 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 34B | — | — |
Sub-benchmarks
OSWorld 2.0
OSWorld 2.0 is a benchmark of 108 long-horizon, real-world computer-use workflows spanning everyday and professional tasks. Each task is an end-to-end workflow that takes human users a median of about 1.6 hours, scored with a binary-completion metric, and targets challenges such as dynamic environments, cross-source reasoning, and implicit-state inference.
OSWorld-G
OSWorld-G (Grounding) evaluates screenshot grounding accuracy for OS automation tasks.
OSWorld-Verified
OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.
What is OSWorld?
OSWorld: The first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS with 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop applications, OS file I/O, and multi-application workflows
OSWorld is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, general, agents, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 20 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.5, with the leader at 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for general, best AI for agents and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Current leaders
Seed 2.1 Pro from ByteDance currently leads the OSWorld leaderboard with a score of 0.788 across 20 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
- Authors
- Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, and 13 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2404.07972
Abstract
Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.
FAQ
Common questions about the OSWorld benchmark and leaderboard.