OSWorld
OSWorld: The first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS with 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop applications, OS file I/O, and multi-application workflows
Claude Opus 4.6 from Anthropic currently leads the OSWorld leaderboard with a score of 0.727 across 18 evaluated AI models.
What OSWorld measures
OSWorld is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on general, multimodal, vision, and agents tasks. LLM Stats tracks 18 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.4, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for general, best AI for multimodal, best AI for vision and best AI for agents leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- OSWorld: Benchmarking Multimodal Agents for Open-Ended Tasks in Real Computer Environments
- Authors
- Tianbao Xie, Danyang Zhang, Jixuan Chen, Xiaochuan Li, and 13 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2404.07972
Abstract
Autonomous agents that accomplish complex computer tasks with minimal human interventions have the potential to transform human-computer interaction, significantly enhancing accessibility and productivity. However, existing benchmarks either lack an interactive environment or are limited to environments specific to certain applications or domains, failing to reflect the diverse and complex nature of real-world computer use, thereby limiting the scope of tasks and agent scalability. To address this issue, we introduce OSWorld, the first-of-its-kind scalable, real computer environment for multimodal agents, supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across various operating systems such as Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS. OSWorld can serve as a unified, integrated computer environment for assessing open-ended computer tasks that involve arbitrary applications. Building upon OSWorld, we create a benchmark of 369 computer tasks involving real web and desktop apps in open domains, OS file I/O, and workflows spanning multiple applications. Each task example is derived from real-world computer use cases and includes a detailed initial state setup configuration and a custom execution-based evaluation script for reliable, reproducible evaluation. Extensive evaluation of state-of-the-art LLM/VLM-based agents on OSWorld reveals significant deficiencies in their ability to serve as computer assistants. While humans can accomplish over 72.36% of the tasks, the best model achieves only 12.24% success, primarily struggling with GUI grounding and operational knowledge. Comprehensive analysis using OSWorld provides valuable insights for developing multimodal generalist agents that were not possible with previous benchmarks. Our code, environment, baseline models, and data are publicly available at https://os-world.github.io.
Claude Opus 4.6 leads with 72.7%, followed by
Claude Sonnet 4.6 at 72.5% and
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at 66.7%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on OSWorld
OSWorld Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | 1.0M | $5.00 / $25.00 | ||
| 2 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.30 / $1.50 | ||
| 4 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | Zhipu AI | — | — | — | ||
| 6 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $3.00 / $15.00 | ||
| 7 | Anthropic | — | 200K | $1.00 / $5.00 | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 34B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about OSWorld.
Sub-benchmarks
OSWorld-G
OSWorld-G (Grounding) evaluates screenshot grounding accuracy for OS automation tasks.
OSWorld-Verified
OSWorld-Verified is a verified subset of OSWorld, a scalable real computer environment for multimodal agents supporting task setup, execution-based evaluation, and interactive learning across Ubuntu, Windows, and macOS.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
LiveCodeBench is a holistic and contamination-free evaluation benchmark for large language models for code. It continuously collects new problems from programming contests (LeetCode, AtCoder, CodeForces) and evaluates four different scenarios: code generation, self-repair, code execution, and test output prediction. Problems are annotated with release dates to enable evaluation on unseen problems released after a model's training cutoff.
Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints