RealKIE-FCC
RealKIE-FCC is a key information extraction benchmark drawn from real enterprise documents (FCC filings), part of the RealKIE suite of five novel datasets for enterprise key information extraction. Models must convert documents to markdown and extract structured fields against a specified JSON schema. Nova 2 reports results on a human-verified version of the dataset.
Nova 2 Pro from Amazon currently leads the RealKIE-FCC leaderboard with a score of 0.670 across 3 evaluated AI models.
What RealKIE-FCC measures
RealKIE-FCC is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, document understanding, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 3 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.6, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for document understanding and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- RealKIE: Five Novel Datasets for Enterprise Key Information Extraction
- Authors
- Benjamin Townsend, Madison May, Katherine Mackowiak, Christopher Wells
- Published
- arXiv
- 2403.20101
Abstract
We introduce RealKIE, a benchmark of five challenging datasets aimed at advancing key information extraction methods, with an emphasis on enterprise applications. The datasets include a diverse range of documents including SEC S1 Filings, US Non-disclosure Agreements, UK Charity Reports, FCC Invoices, and Resource Contracts. Each presents unique challenges: poor text serialization, sparse annotations in long documents, and complex tabular layouts. These datasets provide a realistic testing ground for key information extraction tasks like investment analysis and contract analysis. In addition to presenting these datasets, we offer an in-depth description of the annotation process, document processing techniques, and baseline modeling approaches. This contribution facilitates the development of NLP models capable of handling practical challenges and supports further research into information extraction technologies applicable to industry-specific problems. The annotated data, OCR outputs, and code to reproduce baselines are available to download at https://indicodatasolutions.github.io/RealKIE/.
Nova 2 Pro leads with 67.0%, followed by Nova 2 Lite at 62.1% and Nova 2 Omni at 59.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on RealKIE-FCC
RealKIE-FCC Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | Amazon | — | 1.0M | $0.30 / $2.50 | ||
| 3 | Amazon | — | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about RealKIE-FCC.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.