RULER 512K

RULER 512K evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 524288-token context budget.

MiniCPM-SALA from OpenBMB currently leads the RULER 512K leaderboard with a score of 0.871 across 1 evaluated AI models.

PaperImplementation

OpenBMBMiniCPM-SALA leads with 87.1%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on RULER 512K

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

RULER 512K Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
19B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about RULER 512K.

What is the RULER 512K benchmark?

RULER 512K evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 524288-token context budget.

What is the RULER 512K leaderboard?

The RULER 512K leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiniCPM-SALA by OpenBMB leads with a score of 0.871. The average score across all models is 0.871.

What is the highest RULER 512K score?

The highest RULER 512K score is 0.871, achieved by MiniCPM-SALA from OpenBMB.

How many models are evaluated on RULER 512K?

1 models have been evaluated on the RULER 512K benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the RULER 512K paper?

The RULER 512K paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06654. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the RULER 512K dataset?

The RULER 512K dataset is available at https://github.com/NVIDIA/RULER.

What categories does RULER 512K cover?

RULER 512K is categorized under long context and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
213 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
107 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models